Judges' Comments
Depth of Field Tutorial
Judge
1
Comments:
Excellent! A tour de force of interactive learning bec it is both
simple for the viewer and interactive in that the viewer can select
where to go, proceed, backtrack ... a KISS simple concept that I
am sure took many hours. Congratulations! Excellent!
The scale in
all cases below was from 1 to 5. 1 was poor, 3 average, 5 outstanding.
Content
Was the presentation of content clear? 5
Was the message developed well for the stated audience? 5
Aesthetic Quality
How well did the site's layout and design conform to a theme appropriate
to its stated purpose and audience? 5
How well did the use of color, graphics, images and fonts enhance
the user's experience of the site? 5
Is the design of both the individual pages and the Web site as a
whole professional in look and feel? 5
Please rate the overall aesthetic quality of the site based on the
stated objectives and audience. 4
User Interface and Navigation
Was the user interface appropriate to the site's stated audience
and objectives? 5
Was the user interface attractive and appealing? 4
Was user orientation ("Where am I?") within the site easy
and intuitive? 5
Was navigation of the site ("Can I go where I want to go?")
easy and intuitive? 5
Total Score (10 = poor, 50 = outstanding) 48
Use of Technology
Did the site incorporate interactive technologies or multimedia?
Yes
Did the site use appropriate interactive technologies or multimedia
to enhance the stated purpose or message of the site? 5
Did the site's use of interactive technologies or multimedia improve
navigation within the site? 5
Was the site's use of interactive technologies or multimedia consistent
with the stated objective(s) or purpose of the site? 5
Did the site's interactive or multimedia features provide something
useful for the intended audience? 5
Overall Evaluation (1 = poor; 3 = average/good; 5 = outstanding)
5
Judge
2
Comments:
Good tutorial. Nicely designed and executed examples.
The scale in
all cases below was from 1 to 5. 1 was poor, 3 average, 5 outstanding.
Content
Was the presentation of content clear? 5
Was the message developed well for the stated audience? 5
Aesthetic Quality
How well did the site's layout and design conform to a theme appropriate
to its stated purpose and audience? 5
How well did the use of color, graphics, images and fonts enhance
the user's experience of the site? 5
Is the design of both the individual pages and the Web site as
a whole professional in look and feel? 5
Please rate the overall aesthetic quality of the site based on
the stated objectives and audience. 5
User Interface and Navigation
Was the user interface appropriate to the site's stated audience
and objectives? 5
Was the user interface attractive and appealing? 5
Was user orientation ("Where am I?") within the site
easy and intuitive? 5
Was navigation of the site ("Can I go where I want to go?")
easy and intuitive? 5
Total Score (10 = poor, 50 = outstanding) 50
Use of Technology
Did the site incorporate interactive technologies or multimedia?
Yes
Did the site use appropriate interactive technologies or multimedia
to enhance the stated purpose or message of the site? 5
Did the site's use of interactive technologies or multimedia improve
navigation within the site? 4
Was the site's use of interactive technologies or multimedia consistent
with the stated objective(s) or purpose of the site?
Did the site's interactive or multimedia features provide something
useful for the intended audience? 5
Overall Evaluation (1 = poor; 3 = average/good; 5 = outstanding)
5